This week, the fate of the Bush tax cuts looms large as Congress debates whether or not to extend them beyond this year. President Obama would like to keep the low rates for everyone except the country's wealthiest individuals. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said on Sunday he'd prefer extending tax cuts for all but would rather go with Obama's plan than none at all—a compromise the conservative news site Daily Caller labeled as "Going soft." Can the two parties reach a consensus?

  • The Right Will Kill Boehner for This, writes Stuart Shapiro at Liberaland: "The left has been saying for a while that the politics on this is as good as the policy.  If Boehner’s announcement holds, once he gets barbecued in the right wing blogosphere (I can’t wait to see what the Club For Growth has to say — maybe they’ll primary Boehner), then this will be a major win for Obama and for the country."

  • It's Up to the Dems Now, writes Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway: "The ball is in the hands of the Democratic leaders in the House and the Senate. It would seem to be fairly easy for them to pull together a bill extending the tax cuts for Americans earning less than $ 250,000. Its hard to believe that any politician in a tight race, Republican or Democrat, is going to want to go on record as being against tax cuts immediately prior to an election. If they don’t do it, then they face the risk of losing control of one or both Houses of Congress and thus giving the GOP an excellent opportunity to extend the tax cuts across the board. So, what are you going to do Democrats?"
  • Boehner Said What? "That's very Keynesian of him to have the concern that 'raising taxes in a very weak economy is a really, really bad idea,'" observes Mark Thoma at Economist's View. "And there's an easy response for Democrats... The Democrats say okay, if that's your concern, why not transfer the tax cuts, temporarily, to lower income groups who are much more likely to spend the money, or use it to backfill state and local budgets to stop further job losses? There are all sorts of ways to use the money that would be more stimulative than continuing the tax cuts for the wealthy, so if your objection is that raising taxes in a recession is 'a really, really bad idea,' then transfer the tax cuts where they will do the most good."
  • No Easy Solution for Dems, writes Jonathan Allen at Politico: "The situation may well be lose-lose-lose for Democrats. If they raise taxes on higher income Americans, they risk alienating moderate voters and campaign contributors in closely contested races in Republican-leaning districts. If they freeze the rates for everyone, they risk depressing an already deflated liberal base in districts all across the country — including those represented by centrist Democrats. And, if they kick the can down the road with a one- or two-year extension for the highest earners, President Barack Obama will have to wrestle with the issue again heading into his 2012 re-election campaign."
  • This Is Political Jujitsu, observes Mike Allen at Politico: "The basis of this spat is as confusing as it is obscure: The plan they're discussing probably couldn't get out of the Senate, anyway. But the opportunistic White House plans to keep pushing this attack - hard. And aides contend that the offensive vindicates their strategy of elevating Boehner. They built him up; now they can try to tear him down... A top operative e-mails after a few glasses: 'This is political jujitsu at the highest level --- use ur opponents weight when he tries to punch you to pull him over you and put him on his back then quick punch to the adam's apple.'"