Michael Steele's GOP Purity Test, dubbed "The Reagan Resolution," outlines 10 "conservative principles" ostensibly central to the GOP's agenda. While many Republicans have warily steered clear of the test, it has stood up for many as an ideal of conservative perfection.
But would Ronald Reagan, the test's namesake icon, pass? The Atlantic's Michael Kinsley and the Daily Beast's Peter Beinhart both say no. Each columnist tests Reagan's executive record against the 10 "conservative principles," and both find the former president in violation of more than two (the pass/fail cutoff). A few of Reagan's "failures" particularly stand out:
- Smaller Government Beinhart homes in on the first principle: "'smaller government, smaller
national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes.' Let's take those from
the top. Smaller government: Federal employment grew by 61,000
during Reagan's presidency--in part because Reagan created a whole new
cabinet department, the department of veterans affairs. (Under Bill
Clinton, by contrast, federal employment dropped by 373,000). Smaller deficits and debt: Both nearly tripled on Reagan's watch. Lower taxes:
Although Reagan muscled through a major tax cut in 1981, he followed up
by raising taxes in 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1986."
- Illegal Immigration Beinhart also finds Reagan wanting on principle five: "Reaganite candidates must 'oppos[e] amnesty for illegal immigrants.' Really? Because if you look up the word "amnesty" in Black's Law Dictionary, you'll find a reference to the 1986 bill that Reagan signed, which ended up granting amnesty to 2.7 million illegal immigrants."
- Opposing Gun Restrictions Kinsley digs up an old Reagan op-ed: "In 1991, after leaving office, Reagan wrote (or at least
signed) a New York Times op-ed
urging his successor, George H.W. Bush, to sign the Brady Bill, a gun
control law named for Reagan's first press secretary, who was badly
injured in John Hinckley's assassination attempt on Reagan." As Kinsley concludes: "Good thing Chairman Steele made the whole thing voluntary. It would be
sad to think that the Republican Party no longer has room for Ronald